65 Delmar Avenue Framingham, MA 01701 March 18, 2013 hjw2001@gmail.com 508-561-8452 Commission on Judicial Conduct c/o Executive Director 11 Beacon Street, Suite 525 Boston, MA 02108 617-725-8050 Dear sir/madam, I would appreciate it if you could take the time to read my eleven page synopsis of my trial on 10/05/2012, which I believe involved federal crimes as outlined in my complaint. How can the district court bypass a pre-trial conference with a magistrate? How can a judge actually accept a case of vandalism without any photographic evidence? How can two persons (the DA and the judge) acting under the color of law look at a car door and convict me of vandalism and send me to jail for a month. The DA stating that the Commonwealth had proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt and the judge convicting me, but later, (only after my jail sentence) the judge admits he had seen no damage. How's that for the failure to provide exculpatory evidence. Given the statements the judge made in court about the certainty of the damage (Page 87, line 19), this constitutes outright perjury and malicious behaviour by both the DA and the judge in a conspiracy. I sincerely hope you do not allow judge David W. Cunis to continue to represent you as a member of the Massachusetts judiciary. If you wish to have more information than what I supplied on the enclosed DVD, you may feel free to contact me, preferably in the morning or early afternoon. Sincerely yours, Harold J. Wolfe

Send comments to: hjw2001@gmail.com